1. It is better to sign-up/log-in before you post your question (or reply to an existing thread), instead of posting as a guest.
    This will allow you to easily look up the Q&A sequence anytime, anywhere, with just one mouse click. Learn more...

    You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ accounts, or create a KVMGalore HelpCenter user-name/password.
    Dismiss Notice

Matrix Matrix + extension solution for a lecture hall

Discussion in 'Audio/Video' started by Tony S, Mar 23, 2015.

  1. Tony S

    Tony S New member

    I'm looking for an 8x8 HDMI matrix solution for a lecture hall supporting 1080p and using HDBaseT extension.

    One input is VGA; all other inputs are HDMI.
    All screens are HDMI.

    The matrix should be able to facilitate any one-to-one, as well as any one-to-many connection.
    The matrix should be able to be controlled remotely (IR or TCP/IP, for example).

    Both inputs and outputs are about 100 feet away from where the matrix will be located, requiring extension from all inputs to the matrix, and from the matrix to all screens.

    Screen locations cannot facilitate power, so the signal receivers from the matrix should operate WITHOUT being directly powered (using PoE or other solutions).

    Lastly, it will be very beneficial to have the receivers (by the screens) in a wall-plate form factor.
     
  2. KVMGalore Expert

    KVMGalore Expert Staff Member

    Conceptually, this application can be accomplished using three types of solutions:

    1) Fully-integrated: The matrix has built-in receivers (to receive the input signals from the remote sources) as well as built-in transmitters to send the signals to the screen. Such solution will include:
    - Matrix switch
    - 8 transmitters (at the sources)
    - 8 receivers (at the screens)
    This type solution will be the most expensive one, at around $25,000.

    2) Semi-integrated: The matrix does not have built-in receivers (to receive the input signals from the remote sources) but does have built-in transmitters to send the signals to the screen. Such solution will include:
    - Matrix switch
    - 8 transmitters (at the sources)
    - 16 receivers (8 at the matrix; 8 at the screens)
    - Optional rack-mounts for the receivers at the matrix
    This type solution will be middle-of-the-road in terms of cost, at around $11,000.

    3) Non-integrated: The matrix does not have built-in receivers (to receive the input signals from the remote sources) and does not have built-in transmitters to send the signals to the screen. Such solution will include:
    - Matrix switch
    - 16 transmitters (8 at the sources; 8 at the matrix)
    - 16 receivers (8 at the matrix; 8 at the screens)
    - Optional rack-mounts for the transmitters/receivers at the matrix
    This type solution will be the least expensive one, at around $8,000.

    All solutions will be using a single CATx cable per run, but some extension systems are not HDBaseT.

    For the lone VGA source, all solutions will require the use of a VGA to HDMI converter deployed between the source and the matrix.

    All solutions will offer either built-in or optional control methods such as RS-232, TCP/IP, IR or via iPad.

    Please let us know which route would you like to take, and we'll be happy to put together a specific quote for you.

    P.S. If you wish to respond or follow-up, it is better that you sign-in before you reply to this thread (instead of posting as a guest). This will allow you to easily look up this conversation anytime, anywhere, with just one mouse click.
     
  3. Tony S

    Tony S New member

    I would like to receive quotes for Fully-integrated and Semi-integrated options.
    I would be interested in the rack-mount option for the receivers at the matrix in the semi-integrated option.
    I would be interested in systems that support TCP/IP remote control, or iOS remote control, or both.
     
  4. KVMGalore Expert

    KVMGalore Expert Staff Member

    A fully-integrated system turned out not being feasible.

    For a semi-integrated solution you may consider the following:

    1) Key Digital: ~ $11,000 (~ $14,100 including Compass Control for iOS control)
    Advantages: iOS control; rack-mount for receivers
    Disadvantages: No wall-plate receivers

    2) NTI: ~ $8,700
    Advantages: Wall-plate receivers
    Disadvantages: No iOS control; No rack-mount for receivers; 3-4 weeks lead time for wall-plate receivers

    3) Gefen: ~ $12,600
    Advantages: Gefen brand
    Disadvantages: No iOS control; No rack-mount for receivers; No wall-plate receivers

    P.S. If you wish to respond or follow-up, it is better that you sign-in before you reply to this thread (instead of posting as a guest). This will allow you to easily look up this conversation anytime, anywhere, with just one mouse click.
     
  5. Tony S

    Tony S New member

    One change to the specs: I need the transmitters by the source to also be in wall-plate form factor.

    Could you please provide a detailed quote for the NTI system?
     
  6. KVMGalore Expert

    KVMGalore Expert Staff Member

    We were able to modify the specs and put together a configuration using NTI product that accommodates this change.

    The system will include:
    - Matrix switch with built-in transmitters and eight RJ45 outputs
    - 8 wall-plate transmitters (at the sources)
    - 8 receivers at the matrix (from the sources), sitting on a rack-tray
    - 8 wall-plate receivers at the screens
    - A VGA to HDMI converter deployed between the VGA source and the transmitter for the lone VGA source

    A line-item quote is being written up for you and will be e-mailed to you shortly.

    P.S. If you wish to respond or follow-up, it is better that you sign-in before you reply to this thread (instead of posting as a guest). This will allow you to easily look up this conversation anytime, anywhere, with just one mouse click.
     

Share This Page